Before writing this post I wondered two days, which in turn can be encouraging to the person views the film? Does writing about "The King's Speech" has a meaning? After long reflection, however, have indicated that you do not! Why should I defend myself pleasure wygadania about the film, which is very nice!
this time I will not describe the movie plot, but I will point out to you what I personally most enjoyed in it, I suspect that, with these few previous posts on other blogs, we all already know exactly what the movie was ...:)
The movie made me a very positive impression for several reasons.
first love movie costume, especially if the time of the eighteenth, nineteenth and early twentieth century. This movie, of course, fits exactly in my taste, because the action "The King's Speech" is set in the interwar years.
Secondly, I liked the amazing photos in this film. Sometimes the room wall was able to occupy three quarters of the screen. Beautifully ...
Third and obvious - Colin Firth. I like this actor a very long time, and hardly ever on it do not fail when it comes to his choice of film scripts or a way of playing. Best is, and I do not remember where I saw it the first time and where he made me such a positive impression that has since been constantly follow him (not sure it was "Pride and Prejudice" because this film with Firth as Mr. Darcy 's oglądnęłam first time relatively recently)?
Fourth and obvious - Helena Bonham Carter, which I love in "The King's Speech"! Prior to remind me of two things: the films of her husband in which she played a strange but colorful characters, and his crazy image of a person who totally does not care how it looks or what is wearing ... In this film she played a wonderful role, and if the Queen Mother was in fact such as that presented in this film, it does not wonder that the British love her so ...
Fifthly, it is a film on the facts. Personally, I do appreciate movies pradziwe telling stories that after finishing a session forcing me to search and read how it really was or what was the continuation of the history presented.
Sixthly, I liked the presentation of his brother King George VI, who I felt was in the press and various publications on the British royal family is portrayed as the only 'fair' and that's because he devoted for love. And here's a surprise: gallant, who believes that everything he is allowed, in addition sympathetic to Hitler (which for me was the peak of stupidity and blindness). Maybe I'm not very nice at this point, but it serves him right! Just in this case from what was presented in the film, someone else from the two brothers are dedicated ...
Seventh, I believe that the film is good enough to deserve more than one Oscar and I am glad that the "Avatars" do not arise every year, because if they did not have noted the University is likely to nothing more valuable, but with less impact ...
recommend!
Ps. Once again the Polish title leads me to a passion, because everything can be said about this film, but certainly not for the fact that he is about to become king. I think rather it is a film about how you need to be the king when he does not want ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment